Affiliation:
1. Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. Cambridge Massachusetts USA
2. Orlando Clinical Research Center Orlando Florida USA
3. Clinical Pharmacology of Miami LLC Miami Florida USA
4. The Texas Liver Institute University of Texas Health San Antonio San Antonio Texas USA
Abstract
AbstractThis phase 1, open‐label, three‐arm study (NCT05098054) compared the pharmacokinetics and safety of soticlestat (TAK‐935) in participants with hepatic impairment. Participants aged ≥18 to <75 years had moderate (Child‐Pugh B) or mild (Child‐Pugh A) hepatic impairment or normal hepatic function (matched to hepatic‐impaired participants by sex, age, and body mass index). Soticlestat was administered as a single oral 300 mg dose. Pharmacokinetic parameters of soticlestat and its metabolites TAK‐935‐G (M3) and M‐I were assessed and compared by group. The incidence of treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and other safety parameters were also monitored. The pharmacokinetic analyses comprised 35 participants. Participants with moderate hepatic impairment had lower proportions of bound and higher proportions of unbound soticlestat than participants with mild hepatic impairment and normal hepatic function. Total plasma soticlestat pharmacokinetic parameters (maximum observed concentration [Cmax], area under the concentration‐time curve from time 0 to time of last quantifiable concentration [AUClast], and AUC from time 0 to infinity [AUC∞]) were approximately 115%, 216%, and 199% higher with moderate and approximately 45%, 35%, and 30% higher with mild hepatic impairment, respectively, than healthy matched participants. Moderate hepatic impairment decreased the liver's ability to metabolize soticlestat to M‐I; glucuronidation to M3 was also affected. Mild hepatic impairment resulted in a lower total plasma M‐I exposure, but glucuronidation was unaffected. TEAEs were similar across study arms, mild, and no new safety findings were observed. A soticlestat dose reduction is required for individuals with moderate but not mild hepatic impairment.
Reference36 articles.
1. Methodology for classification and definition of epilepsy syndromes with list of syndromes: Report of the ILAE Task Force on Nosology and Definitions
2. AndradeDM NascimentoFA.Dravet syndrome: Genetics clinical features and diagnosis. Accessed 13 June 2023.https://www.uptodate.com/contents/dravet‐syndrome‐genetics‐clinical‐features‐and‐diagnosis?search=Dravet&source=search_result&selectedTitle=2~28&usage_type=default&display_rank=2
3. WilfongA.Lennox‐Gastaut syndrome. Accessed 13 June 2023.https://www.uptodate.com/contents/lennox‐gastaut‐syndrome?search=lennox%20gastaut%20syndrome&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1~150&usage_type=default&display_rank=1
4. Efficacy and safety of adjunctive antiseizure medications for dravet syndrome: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
5. Expanding the Treatment Landscape for Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome: Current and Future Strategies