Modified double‐pulley fixation provides better reduction of bone fragments and union compared to single‐point fixation in bony Bankart lesions

Abstract

AbstractPurposeThe purpose of this study was to compare clinical scores and imaging outcomes of bony Bankart lesions that underwent single‐point and modified double‐pulley fixation after at least 2 years of follow‐up.MethodsPatients who underwent surgery to treat bony Bankart injuries were included and divided into groups A and B. A total of 69 patients were included (32 in group A and 37 in group B). Patients in group A underwent arthroscopic modified double‐pulley fixation and patients in group B underwent arthroscopic single‐point fixation. Three‐dimensional computed tomography (3D‐CT) was used to assess glenoid reduction one day after surgery. Postoperative bony union was assessed using 3D‐CT and multiplanar reconstruction images 6 months after surgery. Constant–Murley, Rowe rating system, visual analogue scale and University of California at Los Angeles and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores were recorded before and after surgery.ResultsIn terms of imaging measurements, there was no significant group difference in the preoperative size of the glenoid defect, the size of the bony fragment or the expected postoperative size of the glenoid defect. The sizes of the actual postoperative glenoid defects differed significantly between the groups (p = 0.027), as did the absolute difference between the expected and actual glenoid defect sizes (p < 0.001). At 6 months postoperatively, 50.0% of group A patients and 24.3% of group B patients exhibited complete bony union (p = 0.027); the rates of partial union were 37.5% and 56.8%, respectively. At the final follow‐up, all clinical scores were significantly better than the preoperative scores (all p < 0.05), with no significant group differences (not significant).ConclusionsThe use of the modified double‐pulley technique with two anchors to treat bony Bankart injuries provides a better reduction of bone fragments than single‐point fixation with two anchors and was associated with a higher rate of early bone union.Level of EvidenceLevel III.