Knowledge and attitude factors influencing primary care clinicians' diagnosis, treatment and management of urinary tract infections in women: A qualitative ‘think’ aloud study in England

Author:

Mwape Angela Kabulo1ORCID,Schmidtke Kelly Ann2ORCID,Brown Celia1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Warwick Medical School (WMS) University of Warwick Coventry UK

2. University of Health Science and Pharmacy in St Louis St. Louis Missouri USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesThe present study aimed to identify factors related to knowledge and attitudes that influence primary care clinicians' decision‐making when diagnosing, treating, and managing suspected urinary tract infections (UTIs) in women. Understanding the factors that influence clinicians' decision‐making is important for maximising health outcomes in women and reducing suboptimal use of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance.DesignA qualitative think‐aloud study design was employed.MethodsSemi‐structured qualitative interviews were conducted with primary care clinicians in England over Microsoft Teams. Interviews were transcribed and coded in two ways. First, clinicians' responses for each scenario were coded as either following (optimal), not following evidence‐based national guideline or incorrectly citing certain diagnosis, treatment, and management procedures (suboptimal). Second, the knowledge and attitude factors that influenced decision‐making were coded according to an empirically informed umbrella framework. Clinicians external to the study team reviewed the findings to promote their trustworthiness and utility.ResultsTen clinicians (six female) took part. Clinicians prescribing decisions were mostly influenced by knowledge rather than attitude factors. Despite clinicians expressing high awareness of relevant evidence‐based guidelines (a knowledge factor) and high confidence (an attitude factor), more than half of their decisions (60%) were suboptimal in some way thereby impacting women's health. Most clinicians relied on their experiential knowledge rather than using evidence‐based guidelines. Our results suggest that knowledge could impede adherence, for example, where local guidelines conflict with national guidelines of when to perform a urine dipstick test.ConclusionsSuboptimal prescribing decisions could result from a combination of different knowledge and attitude factors leading to negative outcomes in women's health such as inappropriate treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in women over 65 years old. To optimise antibiotic prescribing in women, policy‐level interventions could increase concordance across local and national guidelines, or more tailored individual‐level interventions could help clinicians recognise where their experiential knowledge causes deviations from evidence‐based guidelines when diagnosing, treating and managing UTIs.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference56 articles.

1. WHO World Health Organization. Fact Sheet: Antimicrobial Resistance [Internet]. 2021.https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antimicrobial-resistance

2. O'NeillJ. Review on Antimicrobial Resistance. Antimicrobial Resistance: Tackling a Crisis for the Health and Wealth of Nations. 2014:16.https://amr-review.org/sites/default/files/AMR%20Review%20Paper%20-%20Tackling%20a%20crisis%20for%20the%20health%20and%20wealth%20of%20nations_1.pdf

3. Antibiotic resistance—the need for global solutions

4. PHE Public Health England. Summary of Antimicrobial Prescribing Guidance: Managing Common Infections. 2021:112.https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/994444/Common_Infect_PHE_context_references_and_rationale_May_2021_Bites_and_Eczema__1_.pdf

5. NIHR National Institute for Health and Care Research. Community Health MedTech and In Vitro Diagnostics Co‐operative. Point‐of‐care Testing for Urinary Tract Infections. Horizon Scan Report 0045. 2016.https://www.community.healthcare.mic.nihr.ac.uk/reports-and-resources/horizon-scanning-reports/point-of-care-testing-for-urinary-tract-infections

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3