Adherence to wearing prescribed footwear in people at risk of diabetes‐related foot ulcers

Author:

Jarl Gustav12ORCID,Hulshof Chantal M.34ORCID,Tijhuis Kim A.3ORCID,Busch‐Westbroek Tessa E.34ORCID,Bus Sicco A.34ORCID,van Netten Jaap J.34ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Prosthetics and Orthotics Faculty of Medicine and Health Örebro University Örebro Sweden

2. University Health Care Research Center Faculty of Medicine and Health Örebro University Örebro Sweden

3. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

4. Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Rehabilitation & Development Amsterdam The Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionAdherence to wearing prescribed footwear is paramount in reducing the risk of developing diabetes‐related foot ulcers, but adherence is often lower than optimal. This study aimed to investigate predictors of footwear adherence and variations in adherence and activity in people at risk of diabetes‐related foot ulceration.MethodsSixty people at high foot ulcer risk were included. We measured the proportion of weight‐bearing acitivity time the prescribed footwear was worn for seven days. Multiple linear regression and analysis of variance were used.ResultsMean overall adherence was 63%. Adherence was lower at home than away from home (59% vs. 74%), while activity was higher at home (2.2 vs. 1.2 h/day). Adherence was similar across activities (61%–63%). No variable predicted the overall adherence. Higher Hba1c predicted lower adherence at home (β = −0.34, p = 0.045, R2 = 11.6%). More daily steps predicted lower adherence away from home (β = −0.30, p = 0.033, R2 = 9.3%). Adherence and activity were highest in mornings (71%, 1.1 h) and afternoons (71%, 1.5 h), and lower in evenings (40%, 0.8 h) and at nights (9%, 0.1 h). Adherence was similar on weekdays and weekend days (63% vs. 60%), but activity was higher on weekdays (3.4 vs. 3.0 h).ConclusionAdherence levels and predictors thereof differed between adherence at home and away from home, so we suggest to treat them as different concepts. Due to the low explained variance, future studies should focus on other predictors such as psychological variables.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3