Raccoon densities across four land cover types in the southeastern United States

Author:

Hill Jacob E.1ORCID,Helton James L.2,Bernasconi David A.2ORCID,Dixon Wesley C.2,Hamilton Matt T.3,Chipman Richard B.4,Gilbert Amy T.5,Beasley James C.2,Dharmarajan Guha6,Rhodes Olin E.7

Affiliation:

1. Savannah River Ecology Laboratory University of Georgia, Drawer E Aiken SC 29802 USA

2. Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources University of Georgia, Drawer E Aiken SC 29802 USA

3. Forestry and Natural Resources Purdue University Lafayette IN 47907 USA

4. National Rabies Management Program, USDA, APHIS Wildlife Services Concord NH 03301 USA

5. National Wildlife Research Center, USDA, APHIS Wildlife Services Fort Collins CO 80521 USA

6. School of Interwoven Arts and Sciences Krea University Sri City AP India

7. Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, Odum School of Ecology University of Georgia, Drawer E Aiken SC 29802 USA

Abstract

AbstractRaccoons (Procyon lotor) are the primary reservoir for rabies virus in eastern North America. Management of rabies in raccoons is achieved primarily with the use of oral rabies vaccination (ORV) and effective ORV bait densities are determined in part by the densities of raccoons. Decisions regarding ORV bait densities, however, are limited by an incomplete understanding of raccoon densities across the spectrum of landscapes they occupy. We carried out a mark‐recapture study of raccoons on the Savannah River Site in South Carolina, USA, from 2017–2019, to develop sex‐ and landscape‐specific raccoon density estimates across 4 rural land cover types in the southeastern United States: bottomland hardwood, riparian forest, isolated wetland, and upland pine (Pinus spp.). We captured 404 unique raccoons 773 times over the 3‐year trapping period. Estimated densities were 5.44 ± 0.37 (SE) animals/km2 in bottomland hardwood forest, 2.62 ± 0.32 animals/km2 in riparian forest, 2.19 ± 0.29 animals/km2 in isolated wetlands, and 2.14 ± 0.23 animals/km2 in upland pine. Densities were significantly higher in bottomland hardwood than all other land cover types, whereas densities among the remaining cover types were similar. These patterns are likely the result of landscape fragmentation and configuration, with riparian forests typically embedded in a matrix of less suitable cover types, leading to low densities despite presumably high resource availability. There were higher densities of males than females in every cover type except upland pine, where the sex ratio was balanced. Densities on our site were low compared to other rural areas, which likely results from the lack of human influence in terms of agriculture or development. The financial cost of baiting for ORV distribution may be reduced by considering the comparatively low densities of raccoons in these rural landscapes in the southeastern United States.

Funder

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

U.S. Department of Energy

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3