Barriers and enablers to the implementation and sustainability of short‐stay arthroplasty programs for elective primary total hip and knee replacement: A systematic review with qualitative evidence synthesis

Author:

Berkovic Danielle1ORCID,Vallance Patrick23,Harris Ian A.45,Naylor Justine M.46,Lewis Peter L.78,de Steiger Richard9,Buchbinder Rachelle1,Ademi Zanfina110,Ackerman Ilana N.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia

2. Department of Physiotherapy Podiatry Prosthetics and Orthotics School of Allied Health Human Service and Sport La Trobe University Melbourne Victoria Australia

3. Department of Physiotherapy School of Primary and Allied Health Care Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia

4. School of Clinical Medicine UNSW Medicine and Health UNSW Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

5. Whitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research Liverpool New South Wales Australia

6. Liverpool Hospital Liverpool New South Wales Australia

7. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Adelaide South Australia Australia

8. Faculty of Medicine University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia

9. Department of Surgery Epworth HealthCare University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia

10. Health Economics and Policy Evaluation Research (HEPER) Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionWe aimed to systematically review contemporary evidence on the barriers and enablers to implementing and sustaining short‐stay arthroplasty programs for elective primary total hip and knee replacement from the perspectives of patients, health professionals, carers, healthcare administrators, funders and policymakers and to map the findings to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF).MethodsMedline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched (up to 19 August 2023). Primary qualitative or mixed‐methods studies reporting on perspectives relating to the review aims that utilised a short‐stay programme were eligible for inclusion. Study quality was assessed using the qualitative critical appraisal tool from the Joanna Briggs Institute. Data were analysed inductively. The final themes were mapped to the TDF. The confidence in the findings was assessed using GRADE CERQual.ResultsFifteen studies were included. Twelve barrier themes and twelve enabler themes were identified. Three themes were graded with high confidence, 10 were graded with moderate confidence, three were graded with low confidence, and eight were graded with very low confidence. The most pertinent domains that the themes were mapped to for patients were beliefs about capabilities, reinforcement, and the environmental context and resources. Health professionals identified knowledge, environmental context and resources as important domains. Two domains were identified for carers: (1) social/professional role and identity and (2) memory, attention, and decision processes.ConclusionWe identified key barrier and enabler themes linked to the TDF that can be used to guide implementation initiatives and promote the sustainability of short‐stay arthroplasty programs.

Funder

HCF Research Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3