Affiliation:
1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproduction and Fetal Medicine CHU de Nice University of Côte d'Azur Nice France
2. RHEOP Grenoble France
3. Vitalité Health Network, Northwest zone, Adjunct Professor (Ret.), Department of Surgery Sherbrooke University Sherbrooke Quebec Canada
4. Department of Neonatology Ottawa University Ottawa Ontario Canada
Abstract
AbstractObjectiveTo consider the classical use of “pH < 7.0 and/or a base deficiency ≥12 mmol/L” as markers of the risk of neonatal hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), recalling various criticisms of the use of these markers in favor of that of neonatal eucapnic pH, which appears to be a better marker of this risk.MethodsFifty‐five cases of acidemia with pH < 7.00 were collected from a cohort from the Nice University Hospital with eight cases of HIE. We compared the receiver operating characteristics curves established from the positive likelihood ratio (+LR) for each case of: umbilical cord artery pH (pHa), neonatal eucapnic pH (pH euc‐n) in isolation (not matched to pHa), and matched pHa to its own pH euc‐n.ResultsThe areas under the curve (AUC) are identical for pHa and pH euc‐n, but AUC for the matched pair pHa–pH euc‐n appears superior but non‐significant because of the small number in our cohort. However, using the bootstrap method, the partial AUC for a sensitivity greater than 75% indicates the significant superiority (P < 0.01) of the matched pair pHa–pH euc‐n approach.ConclusionThe originality of this study lies in the use of two methodologic approaches: (1) standardized partial analysis of the AUCs of the pHa curve and that of pHa matched to its own pH euc‐n, and (2) bootstrap statistical technique, that allowed us to conclude (P < 0.01) that the combined use of pH measured at the cord coupled with its eucapnic correction is better for diagnosing metabolic acidosis and best predicting the risk of HIE.