Triumphs and trials with the UK abortion law: The power of collaboration in abortion reform

Author:

Lord Jonathan123,Regan Lesley345

Affiliation:

1. British Society of Abortion Care Providers London UK

2. MSI Reproductive Choices UK London UK

3. Abortion Taskforce, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists London UK

4. FIGO London UK

5. Imperial College London UK

Abstract

AbstractThe UK is usually viewed as having liberal abortion regulations, providing good access to abortion care within a publicly funded health service. However, the underlying laws are authoritarian, dating from an era when public executions drew large crowds and 67 years before women were able to vote. Abortion is only legal when two doctors certify it meets the permitted grounds, and the penalty for self‐managed abortion is up to life imprisonment for both the woman and any accomplice. These laws had prevented the use of mifepristone and misoprostol at home. Changes to the regulations for misoprostol in 2018 and mifepristone in 2020 permitted home use, but the government announced they were rescinding the approval for mifepristone in 2022. This article discusses how, despite the opposition of government, significant progressive changes to the abortion laws were achieved. Early medical abortion at home is now protected in law, and safe access zones protect patients and staff from harassment and intimidation from protesters. Despite this progress, increasing numbers of women are facing criminal investigation and face long prison sentences if convicted. The need for decriminalization and for abortion care to be regulated like all other health care is the next pressing issue.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference49 articles.

1. UK Parliament.Public order bill volume 729: debated on Tuesday 7 March 2023. Accessed May 25 2023.https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2023‐03‐07/debates/786439D4‐42C7‐43CA‐92A3‐B3F9859F3BE1/PublicOrderBill#contribution‐3964A47D‐7A21‐4EC9‐ABFD‐0582531728A2

2. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.Leading medical bodies express disappointment at Government's decision not to make telemedicine for abortion care permanent.2022. Accessed May 25 2023.https://www.rcog.org.uk/news/leading‐medical‐bodies‐express‐disappointment‐at‐government‐s‐decision‐not‐to‐make‐telemedicine‐for‐abortion‐care‐permanent/

3. Rachel Clarke: Are women’s reproductive rights safe in the UK?

4. YouGov.Where does the British public stand on abortion in 2023?October 12 2023. Accessed December 24 2023.https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/47568‐where‐does‐the‐british‐public‐stand‐on‐abortion‐in‐2023

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Progress toward abortion access and quality care: Examples from across the globe;International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics;2024-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3