Critical evaluation of the scientific content in clinical practice guidelines-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Critical evaluation of the scientific content in clinical practice guidelines

Published:2015-01-29 Issue:11 Volume:121 Page:1907-1908
ISSN:0008-543X
Container-title:Cancer
language:en
Short-container-title:Cancer

Author:

Cervantes Andres¹²,Pentheroudakis George³⁴,Arnold Dirk⁵⁶

Affiliation:

1. Guidelines Committee Chair; European Society for Medical Oncology; Viganello-Lugano Switzerland

2. Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Institute of Health Research Hospital Clinic of Valencia (INCLIVA), University of Valencia; Valencia Spain

3. Guidelines Committee Co-Chair; European Society for Medical Oncology; Viganello-Lugano Switzerland

4. Department of Oncology; University of Ioannina Medical School; Ioannina Greece

5. Guidelines Committee, Subject Editor for Gastrointestinal Cancer, European Society for Medical Oncology; Viganello-Lugano Switzerland

6. Hubertus Wald Tumor Center; University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg Germany

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1002/cncr.29261/fullpdf

Reference4 articles.

1. Critical evaluation of the scientific content in clinical practice guidelines [published online ahead of print November 6, 2014];Abdelsattar;Cancer

2. ESMO Consensus Guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. A personalized approach to clinical decision making;Schmoll;Ann Oncol,2012

3. Fourteen years of evolution of ESMO Guidelines: from the minimum recommendations to the Consensus Conference-derived guidelines;Pavlidis;Ann Oncol,2011

4. Heterogeneity in cancer guidelines: should we eradicate or tolerate?;Pentheroudakis;Ann Oncol,2008

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A critical appraisal of the quality of head and neck cancer imaging guidelines using the AGREE II tool: A EuroAIM initiative;Cancer Medicine;2018-12-21

2. Differential research impact in cancer practice guidelines’ evidence base: lessons from ESMO, NICE and SIGN;ESMO Open;2018

3. Critical Evaluation of the Quality and Recommendations of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma;Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network;2017-03