Affiliation:
1. Nantong University Nantong Jiangsu China
2. Department of Radiology Affiliated Nantong Hospital 3 of Nantong University, Nantong Third People's Hospital Nantong Jiangsu China
3. Department of Pathology Affiliated Nantong Hospital 3 of Nantong University, Nantong Third People's Hospital Nantong Jiangsu China
Abstract
BackgroundVessels encapsulating tumor cluster (VETC) and microvascular invasion (MVI) have a synergistic effect on prognosis assessment and treatment selection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Preoperative noninvasive evaluation of VETC and MVI is important.PurposeTo explore the diagnosis value of preoperative gadoxetic acid (GA)‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features for MVI, VETC, and recurrence‐free survival (RFS) in HCC.Study TypeRetrospective.Population240 post‐surgery patients with 274 pathologically confirmed HCC (allocated to training and validation cohorts with a 7:3 ratio) and available tumor marker data from August 2014 to December 2021.Field Strength/Sequence3‐T, T1‐, T2‐, diffusion‐weighted imaging, in/out‐phase imaging, and dynamic contrast‐enhanced imaging.AssessmentThree radiologists subjectively reviewed preoperative MRI, evaluated clinical and conventional imaging features associated with MVI+, VETC+, and MVI+/VETC+ HCC. Regression‐based nomograms were developed for HCC in the training cohort. Based on the nomograms, the RFS prognostic stratification system was further. Follow‐up occurred every 3–6 months.Statistical TestsChi‐squared test or Fisher's exact test, Mann–Whitney U‐test or t‐test, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator–penalized, multivariable logistic regression analyses, receiver operating characteristic analysis, Harrell's concordance index (C‐index), Kaplan–Meier plots. Significance level: P < 0.05.ResultsIn the training group, 44 patients with MVI+ and 74 patients with VETC+ were histologically confirmed. Three nomograms showed good performance in the training (C‐indices: MVI+ vs. VETC+ vs. MVI+/VETC+, 0.892 vs. 0.848 vs. 0.910) and validation (C‐indices: MVI+ vs. VETC+ vs. MVI+/VETC+, 0.839 vs. 0.810 vs. 0.855) cohorts. The median follow‐up duration for the training cohort was 43.6 (95% CI, 35.0–52.2) months and 25.8 (95% CI, 16.1–35.6) months for the validation cohort. Patients with either pathologically confirmed or nomogram‐estimated MVI, VETC, and MVI+/VETC+ suffered higher risk of recurrence.Data ConclusionGA‐enhanced MRI and clinical variables might assist in preoperative estimation of MVI, VETC, and MVI+/VETC+ in HCC.Evidence Level4Technical EfficacyStage 2
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging