Affiliation:
1. F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging Kennedy Krieger Institute Baltimore Maryland USA
2. Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA
3. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf Dusseldorf Germany
4. Division of Nephrology and Hypertension Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA
5. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA
6. Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R) New York University Langone Health New York City New York USA
Abstract
Diffusion measurements in the kidney are affected not only by renal microstructure but also by physiological processes (i.e., glomerular filtration, water reabsorption, and urine formation). Because of the superposition of passive tissue diffusion, blood perfusion, and tubular pre‐urine flow, the limitations of the monoexponential apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) model in assessing pathophysiological changes in renal tissue are becoming apparent and motivate the development of more advanced diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) variants. These approaches take advantage of the fact that the length scale probed in DWI measurements can be adjusted by experimental parameters, including diffusion‐weighting, diffusion gradient directions and diffusion time. This forms the basis by which advanced DWI models can be used to capture not only passive diffusion effects, but also microcirculation, compartmentalization, tissue anisotropy. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the recent advancements in the field of renal DWI. Following a short introduction on renal structure and physiology, we present the key methodological approaches for the acquisition and analysis of renal DWI data, including intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), non‐Gaussian diffusion, and hybrid IVIM‐DTI. We then briefly summarize the applications of these methods in chronic kidney disease and renal allograft dysfunction. Finally, we discuss the challenges and potential avenues for further development of renal DWI.Level of Evidence5Technical EfficacyStage 2
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
National Institute on Aging
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Reference154 articles.
1. Epidemiology of chronic kidney disease: An update 2022;Kovesdy CP;Kidney Int Suppl,2011
2. Quick Reference on UACR & GFR In Evaluating Patients with Diabetes for Kidney Disease.https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/professionals/advanced-search/quick-reference-uacr-gfr.
3. An overview of errors and flaws of estimated GFR versus true GFR in patients with diabetes mellitus;Luis‐Lima S;Nephron,2016
4. Repuncturing the renal biopsy: Strategies for molecular diagnosis in nephrology;Kretzler M;J Am Soc Nephrol,2002
5. Functional MRI of the kidney: Tools for translational studies of pathophysiology of renal disease;Prasad PV;Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,2006
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献