Assessing a prediction model for depression risk using an early adolescent sample with self‐reported depression

Author:

Xu Eileen Y.1ORCID,MacSweeney Niamh1,Thng Gladi1,Barbu Miruna C.1,Shen Xueyi1,Kwong Alex S. F.1,Romaniuk Liana1,McIntosh Andrew1,Lawrie Stephen M.1,Whalley Heather C.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Psychiatry University of Edinburgh Royal Edinburgh Hospital Edinburgh UK

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundMajor depressive disorder (MDD) in adolescence is a risk factor for poor physical and psychiatric outcomes in adulthood, with earlier age of onset associated with poorer outcomes. Identifying Depression Early in Adolescence Risk Score (IDEA‐RS) is a model for predicting MDD in youth aged >15 years, but replication in younger samples (<15 years) is lacking. Here, we tested IDEA‐RS in a younger sample (9–11 years) to assess whether IDEA‐RS could be applied to earlier onset depression.MethodsWe applied IDEA‐RS predictor weights to 9854 adolescents (9–11 years) from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study, United States. We derived incident depression outcomes from self‐reported data at 2‐year follow‐up (11–13 years): incident MDD and increase in depression symptoms (DS). Sensitivity analyses were conducted using parent‐reported data. We assessed accuracy and calibration in predicting self‐reported incident depression and compared this to a refitted model with predictor weights derived in ABCD. Lastly, we tested associations between IDEA‐RS predictors and self‐reported incident depression.ResultsExternal replication yielded better‐than‐chance discriminative capacity for self‐reported incident depression (MDD: AUC = 61.4%, 95% CI = 53.5%–69.4%; DS: AUC = 57.9%, 95% CI = 54.6%–61.3%) but showed poor calibration with overly extreme risk estimates. Re‐estimating predictor weights improved discriminative capacity (MDD: AUC = 75.9%, 95% CI = 70.3%–81.4%; DS: AUC = 64.8%, 95% CI = 61.9%–67.7%) and calibration. IDEA‐RS predictors ‘poorest level of relationship with the primary caregiver’ (OR = 4.25, 95% CI = 1.73–10.41) and ‘high/highest levels of family conflict’ (OR = 3.36 [95% CI = 1.34–8.43] and OR = 3.76 [95% CI = 1.50–9.38], respectively) showed greatest associations with self‐reported incident MDD.ConclusionsWhile IDEA‐RS yields better‐than‐chance predictions on external replication, accuracy is improved when differences between samples, such as case‐control mix, are adjusted for. IDEA‐RS may be more suited to research settings with sufficient data for refitting. Altogether, we find that IDEA‐RS can be generalisable to early adolescents after refitting and that family dysfunction may be especially impactful for this period of development.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3