How to optimize the systematic review process using AI tools

Author:

Fabiano Nicholas1ORCID,Gupta Arnav23,Bhambra Nishaant4,Luu Brandon5,Wong Stanley6,Maaz Muhammad78,Fiedorowicz Jess G.191011,Smith Andrew L.19,Solmi Marco19101112

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada

2. Department of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada

3. College of Public Health Kent State University Kent Ohio USA

4. Department of Family Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada

5. Department of Medicine University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

6. Department of Psychiatry University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

7. Faculty of Medicine University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

8. Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

9. Department of Mental Health The Ottawa Hospital Ottawa Ontario Canada

10. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (OHRI) Clinical Epidemiology Program University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada

11. School of Epidemiology and Public Health Faculty of Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada

12. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Charité ‐ Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany

Abstract

AbstractSystematic reviews are a cornerstone for synthesizing the available evidence on a given topic. They simultaneously allow for gaps in the literature to be identified and provide direction for future research. However, due to the ever‐increasing volume and complexity of the available literature, traditional methods for conducting systematic reviews are less efficient and more time‐consuming. Numerous artificial intelligence (AI) tools are being released with the potential to optimize efficiency in academic writing and assist with various stages of the systematic review process including developing and refining search strategies, screening titles and abstracts for inclusion or exclusion criteria, extracting essential data from studies and summarizing findings. Therefore, in this article we provide an overview of the currently available tools and how they can be incorporated into the systematic review process to improve efficiency and quality of research synthesis. We emphasize that authors must report all AI tools that have been used at each stage to ensure replicability as part of reporting in methods.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3