Telehealth follow‐up consultations for melanoma patients during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Patient and clinician satisfaction

Author:

Al‐Rikaby Ali1,Sulaiman Ahmad2,Thompson Jake R.12ORCID,Saw Robyn P. M.123,Boyle Frances124,Taylor Nicole5,Carlino Matteo S.125,Morton Rachael L.26,Nieweg Omgo E.23,Thompson John F.123,Bartula Iris12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

2. Melanoma Institute Australia The University of Sydney North Sydney New South Wales Australia

3. Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia

4. Patricia Ritchie Centre for Cancer Care and Research Mater Hospital North Sydney New South Wales Australia

5. Department of Medical Oncology Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals Sydney New South Wales Australia

6. NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Camperdown, Sydney New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionThe COVID‐19 pandemic caused rapid implementation of telehealth for melanoma follow‐up care in Australia. This study explores Australian melanoma patients and clinicians' level of satisfaction with telehealth.MethodsA cross‐sectional study was conducted across three specialist melanoma centres in Sydney, Australia. Melanoma patients (all stages) and clinicians completed mixed methods surveys seeking socio‐demographic and clinical information and questionnaires to assess satisfaction with telehealth. Additionally, patients completed measures of quality of life, fear of cancer recurrence and trust in their oncologist. Patients and clinicians provided open‐ended responses to qualitative questions about their perceptions of telehealth.ResultsOne hundred and fifteen patients and 13 clinicians responded to surveys. Telephone was used by 109 (95%) patients and 11 (85%) clinicians. Fifty‐seven (50%) patients and nine (69%) clinicians preferred face‐to‐face consultations, 38 (33%) patients and 3 (23%) clinicians preferred a combination of face‐to‐face and telehealth consultations. Five (4%) patients and nil clinicians preferred telehealth consultations. Patients diagnosed with early‐stage melanoma, using telehealth for the first time, who have lower trust in their oncologist, and having higher care delivery, communication and supportive care concerns were likely to report lower satisfaction with telehealth. Open‐ended responses were consistent between patients and clinicians, who reported safety, convenience and improved access to care as major benefits, while identifying personal, interpersonal, clinical and system‐related disadvantages.DiscussionWhile telehealth has been widely implemented during COVID‐19, the benefits identified by patients and clinicians may extend past the pandemic. Telehealth may be considered for use in conjunction with face‐to‐face consultations to provide melanoma follow‐up care.

Funder

Friends of The Mater Foundation

National Health and Medical Research Council

University of Sydney

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cancer Research,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology

Reference53 articles.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3