Absolute and relative outcomes of psychotherapies for eight mental disorders: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Cuijpers Pim12,Miguel Clara1,Ciharova Marketa1,Harrer Mathias3,Basic Djordje1,Cristea Ioana A.4,de Ponti Nino1,Driessen Ellen56,Hamblen Jessica78,Larsen Sadie E.79,Matbouriahi Minoo1,Papola Davide1011,Pauley Darin1,Plessen Constantin Y.112,Pfund Rory A.13,Setkowski Kim1415,Schnurr Paula P.78,van Ballegooijen Wouter116,Wang Yingying1,Riper Heleen116,van Straten Annemieke1,Sijbrandij Marit1,Furukawa Toshi A.17,Karyotaki Eirini1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam The Netherlands

2. International Institute for Psychotherapy Babeș‐Bolyai University Cluj‐Napoca Romania

3. Psychology & Digital Mental Health Care Technical University of Munich Munich Germany

4. Department of General Psychology University of Padua Padua Italy

5. Department of Clinical Psychology, Behavioural Science Institute Radboud University Nijmegen The Netherlands

6. Depression Expertise Center Pro Persona Mental Health Care Nijmegen The Netherlands

7. National Center for PTSD White River Junction VT USA

8. Department of Psychiatry Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth Hanover NH USA

9. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee WI USA

10. Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry University of Verona Verona Italy

11. Department of Global Health and Social Medicine Harvard Medical School Boston MA USA

12. Department of Psychosomatic Medicine Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin Berlin Germany

13. Tennessee Institute for Gambling Education & Research, Department of Psychology University of Memphis Memphis TN USA

14. Research Department 113 Suicide Prevention, Amsterdam The Netherlands

15. Department of Pedagogical and Educational Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands

16. Department of Psychiatry Amsterdam University Medical Center Amsterdam The Netherlands

17. Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine and School of Public Health Kyoto Japan

Abstract

Psychotherapies are first‐line treatments for most mental disorders, but their absolute outcomes (i.e., response and remission rates) are not well studied, despite the relevance of such information for health care users, providers and policy makers. We aimed to examine absolute and relative outcomes of psychotherapies across eight mental disorders: major depressive disorder (MDD), social anxiety disorder, panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), specific phobia, post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), obsessive‐compulsive disorder (OCD), and borderline personality disorder (BPD). We used a series of living systematic reviews included in the Metapsy initiative (www.metapsy.org), with a common strategy for literature search, inclusion of studies and extraction of data, and a common format for the analyses. Literature search was conducted in major bibliographical databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials) up to January 1, 2023. We included randomized controlled trials comparing psychotherapies for any of the eight mental disorders, established by a diagnostic interview, with a control group (waitlist, care‐as‐usual, or pill placebo). We conducted random‐effects model pairwise meta‐analyses. The main outcome was the absolute rate of response (at least 50% symptom reduction between baseline and post‐test) in the treatment and control conditions. Secondary outcomes included the relative risk (RR) of response, and the number needed to treat (NNT). Random‐effects meta‐analyses of the included 441 trials (33,881 patients) indicated modest response rates for psychotherapies: 0.42 (95% CI: 0.39‐0.45) for MDD; 0.38 (95% CI: 0.33‐0.43) for PTSD; 0.38 (95% CI: 0.30‐0.47) for OCD; 0.38 (95% CI: 0.33‐0.43) for panic disorder; 0.36 (95% CI: 0.30‐0.42) for GAD; 0.32 (95% CI: 0.29‐0.37) for social anxiety disorder; 0.32 (95% CI: 0.23‐0.42) for specific phobia; and 0.24 (95% CI: 0.15‐0.36) for BPD. Most sensitivity analyses broadly supported these findings. The RRs were significant for all disorders, except BPD. Our conclusion is that most psychotherapies for the eight mental disorders are effective compared with control conditions, but absolute response rates are modest. More effective treatments and interventions for those not responding to a first‐line treatment are needed.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3