Evaluation of the clinical impact of decreasing the maximum osmolarity of neonatal peripheral parenteral nutrition

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo describe the clinical impact of lowering the peripheral parenteral nutrition (PPN) maximum osmolarity limit from 1000 to 900 mOsm/L in patients in two neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study including inborn neonates that received PPN for at least 3 consecutive days within the first 14 days of life. Data were evaluated to compare the ability of PPN with a maximum osmolarity limit of 1000 to 900 mOsm/L to provide daily recommended macronutrient doses, and daily recommended goal calories, as well as to compare the incidence of significant peripheral intravenous (PIV) infiltrates.ResultsA total of 200 PPN orders representing 57 patients were included for analysis, with 100 PPN orders in each osmolarity cohort. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two cohorts. Significantly more PPN orders met goal amino acid doses (45% vs. 24%, p = 0.003) and goal intravenous fat emulsion (IVFE) doses (61% vs. 37%, p = 0.001) in the 1000 mOsm/L osmolarity limit cohort compared to the 900 mOsm/L osmolarity limit cohort. A total of three patients received hyaluronidase for PN infiltration, two in the 1000 mOsm/L osmolarity limit and one in the 900 mOsm/L osmolarity limit cohort (p = 0.6).ConclusionA lower PPN osmolarity limit of 900 mOsm/L significantly limited the ability to provide goal amino acid and IVFE doses to NICU patients compared to the previous osmolarity limit of 1000 mOsm/L without reducing the incidence of PIV infiltration or extravasation.