Affiliation:
1. The Cleft and Craniofacial Center, Department of Plastic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland
2. Department of Pediatric Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
3. THL Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Register of Congenital Malformations Helsinki Finland
4. Department of Plastic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland
5. Department of Knowledge Brokers THL Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare Helsinki Finland
6. Region Stockholm, Academic Primary Health Care Centre Stockholm Sweden
7. Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundCraniosynostosis is a prevalent craniofacial malformation in Finland; however, comprehensive population‐based epidemiological data are limited. This study aimed to estimate the total and birth prevalence of craniosynostosis in Finland from 1987 to 2010 and examine temporal trends.MethodsWe collected the data from nationwide registers maintained by the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare and Statistics Finland, as well as treating hospitals, encompassing live births, stillbirths, terminations for fetal anomalies, and infant deaths with suspected or diagnosed craniosynostosis or skull deformation. A craniofacial surgeon and a clinical geneticist reviewed 1878 medical records for diagnostic confirmation.ResultsOut of 877 craniosynostosis cases, 83% were single‐suture synostoses (all live births), 10% craniosynostosis syndromes, and 7% multisutural non‐syndromic synostoses. Live birth prevalence from 1987 to 2010 was 6.0/10,000 live births, ranging from 5.0/10,000 in 1987 to 7.5/10,000 in 2010. Total prevalence, including live births, stillbirths, and terminations, varied from 5.0/10,000 in 1987 to 8.0/10,000 in 2010. Sagittal synostosis was the most common synostosis, with a prevalence of 3.9/10,000 live births, followed by metopic (0.6/10,000), unicoronal (0.4/10,000), and unilambdoid (0.1/10,000) synostoses.ConclusionsThe total combined prevalence of all craniosynostosis types significantly increased driven by a nonsignificant rise across all subgroups and a significant increase in the syndrome group. In live births increase was significant only within the syndrome subgroup, primarily due to an increase in Muenke syndrome patients. The rising prevalence of syndromes necessitates further investigation. Contrasting with trends in Europe, Australia, and the USA, Finland showed no significant increase in metopic craniosynostosis.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献