Validation of an oncoplastic breast simulator for assessment of technical skills in wide local excision

Author:

Leff D R12,Petrou G1,Mavroveli S1,Bersihand M2,Cocker D1,Al-Mufti R2,Hadjiminas D J2,Darzi A1,Hanna G B1

Affiliation:

1. Department of BioSurgery and Surgical Technology, Imperial College London, London, UK

2. Breast Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Abstract

Abstract Background Simulation enables safe practice and facilitates objective assessment of technical skills. However, simulation training in breast surgery is rare and assessment remains subjective. The primary aim was to evaluate the construct validity of technical skills assessments in wide local excision (WLE). Methods Surgeons of different grades performed a WLE of a 25-mm palpable tumour on an in-house synthetic breast simulator. Procedures were videotaped (blinded), reviewed retrospectively, and independently rated against a procedure-specific global rating scale by two consultant breast surgeons. Specimen radiographs were obtained and the macroscopic distance from the ‘tumour’ edge to the resection margin was recorded in four cardinal directions. Expert consensus was used to construct an Oncoplastic Deviation Score (ODS), assigning points for excessively wide (more than 10 mm) and, conversely, close (less than 5 mm) macroscopic margins. Results Thirty-four surgeons (12 consultant surgeons, 12 specialty trainees and 10 core trainees) participated in the study. Video-based rating scores varied hierarchically with operator expertise (P < 0·050). Inter-rater reliability was excellent (α ≥ 0·80, P < 0·050 for all scales), and inter-rater agreement was moderate (κ = 0·132–0·361, P < 0·050 for all scales). Statistically significant differences were observed on pairwise comparisons between each grade of surgeon in scores for ‘exposure’, ‘skin flap development’, ‘glandular remodelling’, ‘skin closure’ and ‘final product review’ (P < 0·050). Consultants received significantly fewer ODS points than specialty trainees (P = 0·012) and core trainees (P = 0·028). Compared with experts (median 9·0 mm), wider margins were observed amongst specialty trainees (median 12·0 mm) and narrower margins amongst core trainees (median 7·1 mm) (P = 0·001). Conclusion Video ratings of performance and a proposed ODS differentiate surgeons based on technical skills in WLE and may be useful for objective assessment of breast surgery trainees.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3