Affiliation:
1. Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry Babol University of Medical Sciences Babol Iran
2. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Materials Research Center, School of Dentistry, Health Research Institute Babol University of Medical Sciences Babol Iran
3. Health Research Department, Oral Health Research Center, Health Research Institute Babol University of Medical Sciences Babol Iran
4. Health Research Department, School of Dentistry, Health Research Institute Babol University of Medical Sciences Babol Iran
Abstract
ABSTRACTObjectivesThis study assessed the effects of 15% and 20% carbamide peroxide (CP) on color, surface roughness, and hardness of computer‐aided design/computer‐aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) dental ceramics.Materials and MethodsThis in vitro study was conducted on 120 Vita Mark II, Celtra Duo, and Suprinity CAD/CAM ceramic specimens. The ceramic specimens in each group (n = 40) were randomly assigned to two subgroups (n = 20) for polishing and glazing, and their baseline color, surface roughness (Ra), and hardness were assessed. In each subgroup, half of the specimens were exposed to 15% CP, while the other half were exposed to 20% CP. Their color change (ΔE), surface roughness, and hardness were then measured again. Surface roughness, hardness, and color were analyzed sequentially by profilometer, Vickers hardness tester, and spectrophotometer, respectively. Data were analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA, one‐way ANOVA, and post hoc Bonferroni test (α = 0.05).ResultsThe surface roughness of all groups significantly increased after bleaching treatment (p < 0.05). Surface hardness of all groups decreased after bleaching treatment, but this reduction was only significant in Vita Mark II subgroups (glazed, polished, 15%, and 20% CP). The ΔE was not clinically and visually perceivable in any group.ConclusionThe present results revealed that concentration of CP and type of surface treatment affected the surface properties of CAD/CAM ceramics. Type of surface treatment only affected the surface hardness of Vita Mark II ceramics (p < 0.05). Concentration of CP had a significant effect only on polished Vita Mark II.