Affiliation:
1. Department of Neurology University Hospital, Ludwig‐Maximilians‐University Munich Germany
2. German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders University Hospital Ludwig‐Maximilians‐University Munich Germany
3. Graduate School of Systemic Neuroscience Ludwig‐Maximilians‐University Munich Germany
4. Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology Munich Germany
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundUni‐ or bilateral peripheralvestibular impairment causes objective spatial orientation deficits, which can be measured using pen‐and‐paper‐tests or sensorimotor tasks (navigation or pointing). For patients’ subjective orientation abilities, questionnaires are commonly used (e.g., Santa Barbara sense of direction scale [SBSODS]). However, the relationship between subjective assessment of spatial skills and objective vestibular function has only been scarcely investigated.MethodsA total of 177 patients (mean age 57.86 ± 17.53 years, 90 females) who presented in our tertiary Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders underwent neuro‐otological examinations, including bithermal water calorics, video head impulse test (vHIT), and testing of the subjective visual vertical (SVV), and filled out the SBSODS (German version). Correlation analyses and linear multiple regression model analyses were performed between vestibular test results and self‐assessment scores. Additionally, groupwise vestibular function for patients with low, average, and high self‐report scores was analyzed.ResultsForty‐two patients fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for bilateral vestibulopathy, 93 for chronic unilateral vestibulopathy (68 unilateral caloric hypofunction and 25 isolated horizontal vestibulo‐ocular reflex deficits), and 42 patients had normal vestibular test results. SBSODS scores showed clear sex differences with higher subjective skill levels in males (mean score males: 4.94 ± 0.99, females 4.40 ± 0.94; Student's t‐test: t‐3.78, p < .001***). No stable correlation between objective vestibular function and subjective sense of spatial orientation was found. A multiple linear regression model could not reliably explain the self‐reported variance. The three patient groups with low, average, and high self‐assessment‐scores showed no significant differences of vestibular function.ConclusionSelf‐reported assessment of spatial orientation does not robustly correlate with objective peripheral vestibular function. Therefore, other methods of measuring spatial skills in real‐world and virtual environments are required to disclose orientation deficits due to vestibular hypofunction.
Funder
Deutsche Stiftung Neurologie
Gemeinnützige Hertie-Stiftung
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft