Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy within an enhanced recovery after surgery programme (ORANGE II study)

Author:

Wong-Lun-Hing E M12,van Dam R M13,van Breukelen G J P45,Tanis P J6,Ratti F7,van Hillegersberg R8,Slooter G D9,de Wilt J H W10,Liem M S L11,de Boer M T12,Klaase J M13,Neumann U P13,Aldrighetti L A7,Dejong C H C12143,Terkivatan T15,Verhoef C15,Porte R J16,Haverman J W16,Busch O R17,Boermeester M A17,Besselink M G17,Molenaar I Q18,Borel Rinkes I H M18,Bosscha K19,van der Vorst J R20,de Waard J W D21,Gerhards M F22,Patijn G A23,Schmeding M24,Primrose J N25,Abu Hilal M25,Dagher I26,Laurent A27,Topal B28,Edwin B29,Lassen K29,van Duyn E B30,Ambergen A W4,Olde Damink S W31,Bemelmans M H31

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands

2. Nutrim School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands

3. Department of Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany

4. Department of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands

5. CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands

6. Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

7. Department of Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy

8. Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

9. Department of Surgery, Maxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands

10. Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

11. Department of Surgery, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands

12. Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

13. Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

14. GROW – School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands

15. Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

16. University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

17. Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

18. University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

19. Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands

20. Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands

21. Westfriesgasthuis, Hoorn, The Netherlands

22. Onze Lieve Vrouw Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

23. Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands

24. University Hospital Aachen, European HPB Centre Aachen–Maastricht, Aachen, Germany

25. University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK

26. Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Sud, Paris, France

27. Hôpital Henri-Mondor, Paris, France

28. University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

29. Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

30. Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

31. Maastricht University Medical Centre, European HPB Centre Aachen–Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract Background Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LLLS) has been associated with shorter hospital stay and reduced overall morbidity compared with open left lateral sectionectomy (OLLS). Strong evidence has not, however, been provided. Methods In this multicentre double-blind RCT, patients (aged 18–80 years with a BMI of 18–35 kg/m2 and ASA fitness grade of III or below) requiring left lateral sectionectomy (LLS) were assigned randomly to OLLS or LLLS within an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme. All randomized patients, ward physicians and nurses were blinded to the procedure undertaken. A parallel prospective registry (open non-randomized (ONR) versus laparoscopic non-randomized (LNR)) was used to monitor patients who were not enrolled for randomization because of doctor or patient preference. The primary endpoint was time to functional recovery. Secondary endpoints were length of hospital stay (LOS), readmission rate, overall morbidity, composite endpoint of liver surgery-specific morbidity, mortality, and reasons for delay in discharge after functional recovery. Results Between January 2010 and July 2014, patients were recruited at ten centres. Of these, 24 patients were randomized at eight centres, and 67 patients from eight centres were included in the prospective registry. Owing to slow accrual, the trial was stopped on the advice of an independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board in the Netherlands. No significant difference in median (i.q.r.) time to functional recovery was observed between laparoscopic and open surgery in the randomized or non-randomized groups: 3 (3–5) days for OLLSversus 3 (3–3) days for LLLS; and 3 (3–3) days for ONRversus 3 (3–4) days for LNR. There were no significant differences with regard to LOS, morbidity, reoperation, readmission and mortality rates. Conclusion This RCT comparing open and laparoscopic LLS in an ERAS setting was not able to reach a conclusion on time to functional recovery, because it was stopped prematurely owing to slow accrual. Registration number: NCT00874224 (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Funder

Profiling Fund of Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands

ORANGE II study group

Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3