Evaluation of a calibration rig for stereo laparoscopes

Author:

Dowrick Thomas1,Xiao Guofang1,Nikitichev Daniil1,Dursun Eren1,van Berkel Niels1,Allam Moustafa2,Koo Bongjin1,Ramalhinho Joao1,Thompson Stephen1,Gurusamy Kurinchi2,Blandford Ann1,Stoyanov Danail1,Davidson Brian R.2,Clarkson Matthew J.1

Affiliation:

1. Wellcome EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences UCL London UK

2. Royal Free Campus UCL Medical School Royal Free Hospital London UK

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAccurate camera and hand‐eye calibration are essential to ensure high‐quality results in image‐guided surgery applications. The process must also be able to be undertaken by a nonexpert user in a surgical setting.PurposeThis work seeks to identify a suitable method for tracked stereo laparoscope calibration within theater.MethodsA custom calibration rig, to enable rapid calibration in a surgical setting, was designed. The rig was compared against freehand calibration. Stereo reprojection, stereo reconstruction, tracked stereo reprojection, and tracked stereo reconstruction error metrics were used to evaluate calibration quality.ResultsUse of the calibration rig reduced mean errors: reprojection (1.47 mm [SD 0.13] vs. 3.14 mm [SD 2.11], p‐value 1e−8), reconstruction (1.37 px [SD 0.10] vs. 10.10 px [SD 4.54], p‐value 6e−7), and tracked reconstruction (1.38 mm [SD 0.10] vs. 12.64 mm [SD 4.34], p‐value 1e−6) compared with freehand calibration. The use of a ChArUco pattern yielded slightly lower reprojection errors, while a dot grid produced lower reconstruction errors and was more robust under strong global illumination.ConclusionThe use of the calibration rig results in a statistically significant decrease in calibration error metrics, versus freehand calibration, and represents the preferred approach for use in the operating theater.

Funder

Wellcome Trust

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Research

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3