A Comparison of Otolaryngology Residency Applicants Over Time and to Other Surgical Applicants

Author:

Lin Matthew E.1ORCID,Kharidia Khush2,Choe Deborah1,Bagrodia Neelesh1,Luu Neil N.3,Chambers Tamara3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA

2. Department of Internal Medicine University of Texas Southwestern Dallas Texas USA

3. Caruso Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Keck, School of Medicine of the University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveUnderstand how otolaryngology residency applicant characteristics have changed over time and compare them to those of other surgical subspecialties.Study DesignRetrospective analysis of academic, extracurricular, and application data in the Texas Seeking Transparency in Application to Residency databases.SettingApplicants to otolaryngology, neurological surgery, ophthalmology, plastic surgery, urology, and orthopedic surgery applicants from 2019 to 2023.MethodsKruskal‐Wallis, Wilcoxon rank sum, Fischer's exact, and Mann‐Whitney U tests were used to compare temporal, match‐based, and subspecialty differences in applicant characteristics.ResultsAcross 4 match cycles and 541 otolaryngology applicants, significant differences were found in the average number of honored clerkships per applicant (P = 0.044), the percentage of matched applicants (P = 0.017), and the average number of research experiences (P < 0.001), peer‐revied publications (P = 0.002), applied programs (P < 0.001), and interviews received (P = 0.041). Relative to their unmatched counterparts, matched applicants frequently received more interviews, belonged to higher academic quartiles, and were more likely to belong to academic honor societies (all P < 0.05). Matched applicants exhibited significant differences in the number of research experiences (P = 0.002), peer‐reviewed publications (P = 0.004), and applied programs across cycles (P < 0.001). Relative to applicants from other surgical subspecialties, otolaryngology applicants exhibited high amounts of extracurricular involvement, were on par in terms of research output, and received a low proportion of interviews despite applying to a high number of programs.ConclusionMatching into otolaryngology has become increasingly competitive and is as competitive as peer surgical subspecialties. Strong academic performance, judicious program signaling, increased research involvement, and holistic factors like letters of recommendation may help applicants successfully match.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference14 articles.

1. Covid‐19 and the otolaryngology match: an increase in applicants remaining close to home;Whisonant CT;Cureus,2022

2. NRMP. Residency data & reports. 2023. Accessed April 1 2023. https://www.nrmp.org/match-data-analytics/residency-data-reports/

3. Perceived Impact of USMLE Step 1 Score Reporting to Pass/Fail on Otolaryngology Applicant Selection

4. The effects of pass/fail Usmle Step 1 scoring on the otolaryngology residency application process;Goshtasbi K;Laryngoscope,2020

5. Implications of Change to USMLE Step 1 Scoring for Otolaryngology Residency Programs

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3