Patient perception of group consultations for knee osteoarthritis and influence of area‐level deprivation: A service evaluation in a physiotherapy musculoskeletal setting

Author:

Blatgé Hugo1ORCID,Shanmugam Sivaramkumar1ORCID,Slattery Brian2ORCID,Lewis Olivia2,Nicol Zoe2

Affiliation:

1. School of Health and Life Sciences Glasgow Caledonian University Glasgow UK

2. Department of Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy NHS Lanarkshire Bothwell UK

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionGroup consultations are considered valuable for managing musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions. This service evaluation aimed to assess the perception of knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients regarding group consultations in NHS Lanarkshire's MSK service. It also explored the impact of area‐level deprivation on patient engagement.MethodsSurveys were developed to gauge patient satisfaction, preferences, and experiences in virtual and face‐to‐face (FTF) group consultations. Patients were categorised into opt‐out, did not attend (DNA), or opt‐in groups. We used the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation for area‐level deprivation analysis. Descriptive statistics were used for quantitative data, while qualitative data were thematically analysed.ResultsA total of 84 patients participated, and area‐level deprivation was similar across groups. Common engagement barriers included disinterest and transportation issues in opt‐out and DNA groups, and IT problems in the DNA virtual group. Most patients expressed a preference for one‐on‐one consultations. FTF opt‐in patients reported high satisfaction and increased confidence in managing their condition post‐consultation. Virtual opt‐in patients had a more neutral satisfaction level and mixed confidence. They were also less comfortable interacting with others during the consultation. Thematic analysis revealed positive experiences, and areas for improvement such as individual privacy concerns and additional resources.ConclusionOverall, patients were generally satisfied with group consultations for knee OA. The evaluation identified strategies to enhance engagement. Area‐level deprivation did not significantly impact patient participation in group consultations.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3