Thinking Three‐Dimensionally: A Self‐ and Externally‐Controlled Approach to Screening for Drug–Drug–Drug Interactions Among High‐Risk Populations

Author:

Acton Emily K.12ORCID,Hennessy Sean134ORCID,Gelfand Michael A.5,Leonard Charles E.13ORCID,Bilker Warren B.16ORCID,Shu Di1,Willis Allison W.1235,Kasner Scott E.5

Affiliation:

1. Center for Real‐World Effectiveness and Safety of Therapeutics, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

2. Translational Center of Excellence for Neuroepidemiology and Neurology Outcomes Research, Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

3. Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

4. Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

5. Department of Neurology University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

6. Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

Abstract

The global rise in polypharmacy has increased both the necessity and complexity of drug–drug interaction (DDI) assessments, given the growing potential for interactions involving more than two drugs. Leveraging large‐scale healthcare claims data, we piloted a semi‐automated, high‐throughput case‐crossover‐based approach for drug–drug–drug interaction (3DI) screening. Cases were direct‐acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) users with either a major bleeding event during ongoing dispensings for potentially interacting, enzyme‐inhibiting antihypertensive drugs (AHDs) (Study 1), or a thromboembolic event during ongoing dispensings for potentially interacting, enzyme‐inducing antiseizure medications (ASMs) (Study 2). 3DI detection was based on screening for additional drug exposures that served as acute outcome triggers. To mitigate direct effects and confounding by concomitant drugs, self‐controlled estimates were adjusted using negative cases (external “control” DOAC users with the same outcomes but co‐dispensings for non‐interacting AHDs or ASMs). Signal thresholds were set based on P‐values and false discovery rate q‐values to address multiple comparisons. Study 1: 285 drugs were examined among 3,306 episodes. Self‐controlled assessments with q‐value thresholds yielded 9 3DI signals (cases) and 40 DDI signals (negative cases). External adjustment generated 10 3DI signals from the P‐value threshold and no signals from the q‐value threshold. Study 2: 126 drugs were examined among 604 episodes. Assessments with P‐value thresholds yielded 3 3DI and 26 DDI signals following self‐control, as well as 4 3DI signals following adjustment. No 3DI signals met the q‐value threshold. The presented self‐ and externally‐controlled approach aimed to advance paradigms for real‐world higher order drug interaction screening among high‐susceptibility populations with pre‐existent DDI risk.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3