Benefits and barriers to engagement of mental health caregivers in advisory roles: Results from a cross‐sectional survey

Author:

Clark Cynthia12,Dorland Alexis1ORCID,Jaworska Natalia134,McQuaid Robyn J.13,Langlois Michèle2,Dzierszinski Florence1

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Mental Health Research University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada

2. The Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre Ottawa Ontario Canada

3. Department of Neuroscience Carleton University Ottawa Ontario Canada

4. Department of Cellular Molecular Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada

Abstract

AbstractBackground and AimsMental health institutions and community organizations have had difficulty recruiting patients and caregivers onto their Patient, Family, and Community Advisory Committees (PFACs). Previous research has focused on barriers and enablers of engaging patients and caregivers who have advisory experience. This study acknowledges the experiential difference between patients and caregivers by focusing only on caregivers; further, we compare the barriers and enablers between advising versus non‐advising caregivers of loved ones with mental illness.MethodsData from a cross‐sectional survey codesigned by researchers, staff, clients, and caregiver affiliated with a tertiary mental health center were completed by n = 84 caregivers (n = 40 past/current PFAC advising caregivers; n = 44 non‐advising caregivers).ResultsCaregivers were disproportionately female and late middle‐aged. Advising and non‐advising caregivers differed on employment status. There were no differences of the demographics of their care‐recipients. More non‐advising caregivers reported being hindered from PFAC engagement by family‐related duties and interpersonal demands. Finally, more advising caregivers considered being publicly acknowledged as important.ConclusionsAdvising and non‐advising caregivers of loved ones with mental illness were similar in demographics and in reporting the enablers and hindrances that impact PFAC engagement. Nevertheless, our data highlights specific considerations that institutions/organizations should consider when recruiting and retaining caregivers on PFACs.Patient or Public ContributionThis project was led by a caregiver advisor to address a need she saw in the community. The surveys were codesigned by a team of two caregivers, one patient, and one researcher. The surveys were reviewed by a group of five caregivers external to the project. The results of the surveys were discussed with two caregivers involved directly with the project.

Funder

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3