Affiliation:
1. School of Natural Resources University of Nebraska Lincoln 68583 NE USA
2. Sonoran Joint Venture and United States Fish and Wildlife Service Tucson 85705 AZ USA
3. U.S. Geological Survey, Minnesota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit University of Minnesota St. Paul 55108 MN USA
4. Faculty of Kinesiology Sport, and Recreation University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada
5. Resource Science Division Missouri Department of Conservation 3500 E Gans Road Columbia MO USA
6. Department of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Biology University of Minnesota St. Paul 55108 MN USA
Abstract
AbstractDue to the steady decline of duck hunter participation, several studies have investigated means to bolster the duck hunter population. Researchers and wildlife professionals have assumed that simpler regulations would attract new and unconfident hunters to participate in duck hunting. In light of this, we sought to identify what portion of the duck‐hunting population had difficulty understanding species‐specific bag limits or complying with species‐specific bag limits in the field. We also sought to describe hunters who had difficulty complying with specific bag limits and how their difficulties were associated with elements related to demography, attitude, and behavior. We found most hunters had no difficulty understanding (82%) or complying with (74%) species specific bag limits, but flyway (χ2 = 35.06, P < 0.01), number of ducks harvested (χ2 = 9.76, P < 0.01), number of years hunted (χ2 = 9.20, P < 0.01), and gender (χ2 = 4.14, P < 0.05), were important to predicting hunter difficulty with compliance. Hunters who can overcome their difficulties understanding and complying with species‐specific bag limits may be more likely to be integrated into the duck hunting culture, and more likely to continue duck hunting in the future. More species identification tools and fewer species‐specific bag limits may be appropriate for the 18% of the duck hunter population who indicated that bag‐specific regulations were difficult to understand and the 26% who indicated that it was difficult to comply with species‐specific bag limits in the field. A closer look may be warranted for how the trade‐offs associated with the combination of species‐specific bag limits in combination with the variety of duck season zone and split options states employ, license/stamp requirements, area‐specific regulations, and trespass laws may influence duck hunter experiences.
Reference57 articles.
1. Hunting Desertion in Norway: Barriers and Attitudes Toward Retention Measures
2. Patterns of early desertion among New Jersey hunters;Applegate J. E.;Wildlife Society Bulletin (1973‐2006),1989
3. Nurturing sport expertise: factors influencing the development of elite athlete;Baker J.;Journal of Sports Science and Medicine,2003
4. effectsize: Estimation of Effect Size Indices and Standardized Parameters
5. Meeting harvest expectations is key for duck hunter satisfaction
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献