Equivalent efficacy of indoor daylight and lamp‐based 5‐aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for treatment of actinic keratosis

Author:

Ruiz Alberto J.1ORCID,LaRochelle Ethan P. M.1,Fahrner Marie‐Christine P.2,Emond Jennifer A.3,Samkoe Kimberley S.1,Pogue Brian W.1,Chapman M. Shane2

Affiliation:

1. Thayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth Hanover New Hampshire USA

2. Department of Dermatology Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth Hanover New Hampshire USA

3. Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine Hanover New Hampshire USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPhotodynamic therapy (PDT) is widely used as a treatment for actinic keratoses (AK), with new sunlight‐based regimens proposed as alternatives to lamp‐based treatments. Prescribing indoor daylight activation could help address the seasonal temperature, clinical supervision, and access variability associated with outdoor treatments.ObjectiveTo compare the AK lesion clearance efficacy of indoor daylight PDT treatment (30 min of 5‐aminolevulinic acid (ALA) pre‐incubation, followed by 2 h of indoor sunlight) versus a lamp‐based PDT treatment (30 min of ALA preincubation, followed by 10 min of red light).MethodsA prospective clinical trial was conducted with 41 patients. Topical 10% ALA was applied to the entire treatment site (face, forehead, scalp). Patients were assigned to either the lamp‐based or indoor daylight treatment. Actinic keratosis lesion counts were determined by clinical examination and recorded for pre‐treatment, 1‐month, and 6‐month follow‐up visits.ResultsThere was no statistical difference in the efficacy of AK lesion clearance between the red‐lamp (1‐month clearance = 57 ± 17%, 6‐month clearance = 57 ± 20%) and indoor daylight treatment (1‐month clearance = 61 ± 19%, 6‐month clearance = 67 ± 20%). A 95% confidence interval of the difference of the means was measured between −4.4% and 13.4% for 1‐month, and −2.2% and +23.6% for 6‐month timepoints when comparing the indoor daylight to the red‐lamp treatment, with a priori interval of equivalence of ±20%.LimitationsEnsuring an equivalent dose between the indoor and lamp treatment cohorts limited randomisation since it required performing indoor daylight treatments only during sunny days.ConclusionIndoor‐daylight PDT provided equivalent AK treatment efficacy to a lamp‐based regimen while overcoming temperature limitations and UV‐block sunscreen issues associated with outdoor sunlight treatments in the winter.Clinical trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov listing: NCT03805737.

Funder

Norris Cotton Cancer Center

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Dermatology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Portable red-blue light source for antimicrobial photodynamic therapy of orthopaedic implant biofilms;Photonic Diagnosis, Monitoring, Prevention, and Treatment of Infections and Inflammatory Diseases 2024;2024-03-13

2. Smartphone-based dual radiometric fluorescence and white-light imager for quantification of protoporphyrin IX in skin;Journal of Biomedical Optics;2023-08-26

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3