Affiliation:
1. Asada Ladies Clinic Nagoya Japan
2. Asada Institute for Reproductive Medicine Kasugai Japan
Abstract
AbstractPurposeTo analyze whether response to the GnRH test is a predictor of empty follicle syndrome (EFS) and to analyze independent risk factors for EFS.MethodsThe GnRH test results of 3765 patients from 2016 to 2018 were used to define the reference range of the GnRH test. Risk factors for EFS were estimated by multivariate logistic analysis of 5282 cycles (5247 oocyte‐retrieved cycles with GnRH agonist trigger and 35 cycles of EFS) conducted from 2016 to 2019.ResultsGnRH testing showed basal hormone values as follows: median LH 5.2 (95 percentile; 1.3–12.6) mIU/mL, LH 30 min 22.0 (6.8–57.1), basal FSH 7.3 (3.0–20.5), FSH 30 min 11.5 (5.1–30.4) and FSH/LH ratio 1.5 (0.6–4.1). Independent risk factors for EFS were antral follicle count (adjusted odds ratio; 0.94, 95% CI; 0.89–0.99), basal LH (0.78, 0.66–0.90), and days duration of ovarian stimulation (1.41, 1.21–1. 60). The respective thresholds were 8 for AFC, 5.0 for basal LH, and 16 days for duration.ConclusionsLH 30 min values of the GnRH test did not predict EFS. Independent risk factors for EFS were AFC, basal LH and days duration of ovarian stimulation.
Subject
Cell Biology,Reproductive Medicine
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献