Efficacy and safety of follitropin delta versus follitropin alpha/beta in infertility treatment: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Komiya Shinnosuke12ORCID,Watanabe Jun345,Terayama Takero36,Kamijo Kyosuke37ORCID,Okada Hidetaka2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. HORAC Grand Front Osaka Clinic Osaka Japan

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Kansai Medical University Graduate School of Medicine Hirakata, Osaka Japan

3. Systematic Review Workshop Peer Support Group (SRWS‐PSG) Osaka Japan

4. Division of Gastroenterological, General and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery Jichi Medical University Shimotsuke Japan

5. Division of Community and Family Medicine Jichi Medical University Shimotsuke Japan

6. Division of Traumatology and Critical Care Medicine National Defense Medical College Saitama Japan

7. Division of Gynecology Nagano Municipal Hospital Nagano Japan

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundFollitropin δ may be an alternative to conventional follitropin α/β for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) within assisted reproductive treatment (ART), but its efficacy and safety remain unknown. We performed a random‐effects meta‐analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of follitropin δ and follitropin α/β.MethodsWe searched randomized controlled trials comparing follitropin δ and follitropin α/β using MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO‐ITCRP on December 14, 2022. The primary outcomes were the live birth rate and the incidence of moderate or severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation approach. The protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework.ResultsThree studies involving 2682 participants were included in our meta‐analysis. The results indicated that follitropin δ may result in little to no difference in live birth rates (risk ratio [RR], 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91–1.38; low certainty) and the incidence of moderate or severe OHSS (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.48–1.26; low certainty) compared with follitropin α/β.ConclusionFollitropin δ may result in little to no difference in COS compared with follitropin α/β, especially in terms of live births and safety.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3