Scrutinizing gully erosion hotspots using hybridized deep‐learning analysis to avoid land degradation

Author:

Rahmati Omid1ORCID,Soleimanpour Seyed Masoud2,Shadfar Samad3,Zahedi Salahudin1

Affiliation:

1. Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Department, Kurdistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO) Sanandaj Iran

2. Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Department, Fars Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO) Shiraz Iran

3. Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute Agricultural Research and Education Organization (AREEO) Tehran Iran

Abstract

AbstractDespite the importance of the prediction of land susceptibility to gully erosion, there is a lack of research studies adopting the deep‐learning approach. This study aimed to predict gully susceptibility hotspots using hybridized deep‐learning models and evaluate their efficiency. Field records of gully occurrences in a gully‐prone region, the Talwar watershed (6468 km2), eastern Kurdistan province, Iran, were used to generate a gully inventory dataset. A total of 14 geomorphometric, environmental, and topo‐hydrological gully drivers were selected as predictor variables. The hybridized models were developed using convolutional neural network (NNC) and metaheuristic procedures, including the gray wolf optimizer (GWO) and the imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA). The validity of the resulting outputs was investigated based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results revealed that the NNC‐GWO had the highest efficiency in the validation step (AUC = 97.2%), whereas the NNC‐ICA was the second‐best model (AUC = 95.1%). The standalone NNC model showed the lowest accuracy (AUC = 91.2%) in predicting gully susceptibility hotspots compared to NNC‐GWO and NNC‐ICA. Thus, both hybridized models had better predictive performance for identifying gully susceptibility in comparison with the standalone NNC model. Furthermore, according to the NNC‐GWO model, about 0.2% (1294.8 ha) and 0.05% (235.2 ha) of the study area were identified as high and very high gully susceptibility classes. In addition, the application of the standalone NNC led to an overestimation of the susceptibility degree for gully initiation. This study supports researchers efforts to increase the model's performance when working in the land degradation domain.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Soil Science,General Environmental Science,Development,Environmental Chemistry

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3