Factors influencing applicants' rank order in the Genetic Counseling Admissions Match

Author:

West Brayden12ORCID,Selig James P.3ORCID,Simonson Melinda14ORCID,Lepard‐Tassin Tiffany1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Genetic Counseling University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Little Rock Arkansas USA

2. Department of Molecular Genetic Pathology Arkansas Children's Hospital Little Rock Arkansas USA

3. Department of Biostatistics University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Little Rock Arkansas USA

4. Department of Hereditary Cancer University of Colorado Anschutz Aurora Colorado USA

Abstract

AbstractPrevious studies have identified factors that influence genetic counseling applicants' decisions to initially apply to certain schools. However, research on the factors that influence their Genetic Counseling Admissions Match (GCAM) rank order preferences are limited. The purpose of this study was to investigate these factors via an online survey sent to current students and recent graduates who participated in the GCAM. Participants (N = 415) were asked to rank factors within six categories (faculty, students, didactic curriculum, clinical training, cost of attendance, and general program information) on a 7‐point Likert scale. Factors related to clinical training were most influential to applicants (M = 5.68), while factors related to didactic training were least influential to applicants (M = 4.63). Several significant differences existed between underrepresented and overrepresented applicants; overrepresented was defined as White, non‐Hispanic female. Underrepresented applicants were more influenced by the diversity of program faculty (p = 0.016), students (p ≤ 0.001), and the location/patient population (p = 0.003), while overrepresented applicants are more influenced by program graduation and board pass rates (p = 0.021). The results of our study suggest that GCAM rank preferences are influenced by a large number of factors. Additionally, by demonstrating significant differences in the influence of program diversity on underrepresented applicants, the results of our study suggest that JEDI efforts of genetic counseling training programs should continue to be an area of focus, in order to create a more welcoming environment for all students and to further diversify the genetic counseling profession.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Genetics (clinical)

Reference45 articles.

1. Accreditation Council for Genetic Counseling. (2021).Program directory.https://www.gceducation.org/program‐directory/

2. Exploring racial and ethnic minority individuals’ journey to becoming genetic counselors: Mapping paths to diversifying the genetic counseling profession

3. Association of Genetic Counseling Program Directors. (n.d.).Prospective students.https://agcpd.org/prospective‐students/

4. Conscripted curriculum: The experiences of minority genetic counseling students

5. Supporting a sense of inclusion and belonging for genetic counseling students who identify as racial or ethnic minorities

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3