Scientific-methodological knowledge and its development in the educational process

Author:

Gilmanov S. A.1ORCID,Mironov A. V.1ORCID,Mishchenko V. A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Yugra State University

Abstract

                Introduction. For students, mastering the methodological foundations of scientific research plays an important role in professional education, providing scientifically proven support for professional thinking and readiness to scientifically substantiate the practical activities of a specialist to form a mechanism for intellectual and personal self-development. Today, numerous educational literature is being published, and educational disciplines devoted to the methodology of science and scientific research are being introduced. However, in most of the educational and scientific works created by students (course projects, final qualification papers, etc.), methodological provisions are formulated with errors; descriptions of the organisation of research, interpretation and design of their results are unsatisfactory. Therefore, there is the problem of finding ways to improve methodological literacy, methodological competence, and methodological culture of students. The relevance of such research is conditioned by the need to study the causes of such a situation, to develop ways for improving student methodological competence, to highlight and summarise the experience of teaching methodological knowledge, and to suggest ways for improving the educational process. The solution to this problem is especially significant for the humanities specialists (in particular, for educators and psychologists), who deal with the influence on the personality and human consciousness included in the social regulation of human behaviour.                Aim. The present research aims to: 1) substantiate the theoretical approach to the scientific and methodological support of the process of mastering the methodological foundations of scientific research by students as to the development of scientific-methodological knowledge (SMK) based on the analysis of scientific and educational literature, the practice of teaching disciplines aimed at studying the methodological aspects of psychological and pedagogical research; 2) to identify the main guidelines for improving the ways to support the formation of SMK using examples from empirical studies of its development by students in the educational process, from the generalisation of the practical experience of the authors.                Methodology and research methods. The research methodological framework was based on the approaches of Russian scientists to the methodological foundations of science and scientific research as a holistic knowledge, in which principles, norms, methods and scientific and cognitive activity are developed at the philosophical, general scientific, concrete scientific, methodical levels. Analysis, generalisation and systematisation were used as theoretical research methods; testing, survey, included observation and generalisation of experience were applied as empirical methods. To prove the propositions put forward by the authors, four empirically verifiable hypotheses were formulated. Two of them were confirmed: one was partially confirmed; the second one (about the absence of a connection between direct and remote forms with the formation of SMK) was not confirmed. In the mathematical and statistical interpretation of individual research results (correlation and variance types of analysis), the IBM SPSS Statistics 23 was employed.                Results. The guidelines for supporting the development of SMK by students in the educational process were outlined: reliance on the creation of a research project by the trainee; placing the trainees in the position of an independent researcher; developing an understanding of the content and scope of the key concepts of research, its unity and integrity; paying special attention to the transformation of information and its presentation in various forms.                Scientific novelty. The authors proposed and substantiated the idea of the study of the research methodological foundations as the development of SMK, which equips the researcher with an arsenal of guidelines, means and methods of action, providing the closest possible approach to the truth in the search for new scientific knowledge.                Practical significance. The proposed approaches to the development of SMK can be used in the practice of studying disciplines devoted to the research methodological foundations in the social sciences and humanities, in support of students’ course projects and final qualifying works.

Publisher

Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Education

Reference88 articles.

1. Gilmanov S. A. On the factors of difficulties in mastering research skills by future teachers-psychologists. Vestnik Yugorskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Yugra State University. 2017; 44 (1-1): 35–42. DOI: 10.17816/byusu2017131-135-42 (In Russ.)

2. Zvereva N. M., Kas’jan A. A. Methodological knowledge in the content of education. Pedagogika = Pedagogy [Internet]. 1993 [cited 2023 Jul 10]; 1: 9–12. Available from: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?edn=vnjtij (In Russ.)

3. Zagvjazinskij V. I. Metodologija i metodika didakticheskogo issledovanija = Methodology and methods of didactic research [Internet]. Moscow: Pedagogy; 1982 [cited 2023 Jul 10]. 160 p. Available from: http://elib.gnpbu.ru/textpage/download/html/?bookhl=&book=zagvyazinskiy_metodologiya-i-metodika-didakticheskogo-issledovaniya_1982 (In Russ.)

4. Zagvjazinskij V. I. The nature of typical errors in pedagogical research. Innovacionnye proekty i programmy v obrazovanii = Innovative Projects and Programs in Education [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2023 Sep 10]; 3: 28–31. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/harakter-tipichnyh-oshibok-v-pedagogicheskih-issledovaniyah (In Russ.)

5. Zakirova A. F. Methodological apparatus of scientific research in the aspect of the conceptualization of pedagogical knowledge. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2015; 10 (129): 4–19. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2015-10-4-19 (In Russ.)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3