Affiliation:
1. West Kazakhstan University of Innovation and Technology
2. Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University
Abstract
Introduction. The present work investigates the issues related to technological and administrative support for the blended learning process in higher education in Kazakhstan.Aim. This article aims to develop an author’s conceptual model of a unified system for managing the blended learning process by defining the evaluation criteria for an optimal educational environment.Methodology and research methods. The research was conducted in four stages using mixed methods. The first stage involved conducting surveys with participants in the educational process to identify the challenges they encountered while working in a digital educational environment and explore potential solutions. The second stage involved developing evaluation criteria for an optimal educational environment for blended learning. The third stage entailed empirical testing of existing educational platforms that are utilised by 33 leading Kazakh universities. The fourth stage witnessed the development of a pilot conceptual model for a unified environment for blended learning.Results. Based on the integration of Learning Activity Management System (LAMS), Learning Management System (LMS), and Education Content Management System (ECMS), a conceptual model of a unified environment for blended learning was developed. The criteria for the optimal educational environment of blended learning were developed to evaluate the technical, functional, and didactic capabilities of educational platforms.Scientific novelty. The study resulted in the development of a conceptual model for a unified environment for managing the blended learning process.Practical significance. The proposed model can be employed by the administrations of top Kazakhstani universities to implement a student-centred approach to the educational process.
Publisher
Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University
Reference35 articles.
1. Pelletier K., Brown M., Brooks C., et al. 2021 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report, Teaching and Learning Edition. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE; 2021. 50 p. Accessed February 14, 2023. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2021/4/2021-educause-horizon-report-teaching-and-learning-edition
2. Pelletier K., McCormack M., Reeves J., et al. 2022 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report, Teach-ing and Learning Edition. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE; 2022. 58 p. Accessed February 14, 2023. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2022/4/2022-educause-horizon-report-teaching-and-learning-edition
3. Owston R. Empowering learners through blended. International Journal on E-Learning. 2018:17(1):65–83. Accessed February 02, 2023. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/177966
4. Margolis A.A., Sorokova M.G., Shvedovskaja A.A. Face-to-face, blended or online: how do students prefer to study? Psihologicheskaja nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education. 2022;27(5):5–20. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17759/pse.2022270501
5. Zhinesti Zh., Impedovo M.A. International teachers professional developing: blended learning between Europe and Asia. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. 2020;2:114–127. (In Russ.) doi:10.17323/1814-9545-2020-2-114-127
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献