Author:
Fear Christopher F.,Littlejohns Carl S.,Rouse Eryl,McQuail Paul
Abstract
BackgroundThe induction agent propofol is known to reduce electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) seizure duration. It is assumed that outcome from depression is adversely affected by this agent. This study compares propofol and methohexitone as induction agents for ECT.MethodIn a prospective, randomised, double-blind study 20 subjects with major depressive disorder (DSM-III-R criteria) received propofol or methohexitone anaesthesia. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Beck Depression Inventory were used to assess depression before therapy, at every third treatment, and at the end of therapy. Seizure duration was measured using the cuff technique.ResultsMean seizure durations (P < 0.01) and mean total seizure duration (P < 0.01) were shorter in the propofol group. There was no difference in outcome.ConclusionsUse of propofol may not adversely affect outcome from depression and it is not necessarily contraindicated as an induction agent for ECT. Our results should be interpreted cautiously, and larger studies are needed.
Publisher
Royal College of Psychiatrists
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference13 articles.
1. Biological predictors of recovery in ECT;Scott;British Journal of Psychiatry,1989
2. Seizure duration and clinical effect in electroconvulsive therapy
3. Monitoring the Duration of Electroconvulsive Therapy Seizures
4. Efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy after propofol or methohexitone anesthesia;Malsch;Anesthesia and Analgesia,1992
5. ECT practice
Cited by
55 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献