The Comparability of Suicide Rates

Author:

Atkinson M. W.,Kessel Neil,Dalgaard J. B.

Abstract

SummaryProgrammes of suicide prevention require for their planning accurate epidemiological surveys.Doubt has been cast on the accuracy of many existing surveys because of the realization that suicide is under-reported and because of the lack of consistency in the procedure for suicide ascertainment.Two studies are described in this paper which attempt to examine the problem.The first is part of an international study supported by the World Health Organization. In it, Denmark and England are compared, and it is shown that there are striking differences in suicide ascertainment procedure between the two countries. Next, on a blind basis, coroners and their opposite numbers in Denmark examine a sample of each other's case records. It is found that the Danes consistently report more suicides than do the English coroners on the same case material; thus considerable doubt is cast on the supposed difference in suicide rates between the two countries.In the second study, deaths by poisoning are examined for certain coroners' districts in England and Wales. It is shown that there is considerable variation from one district to another in the relative proportions of these deaths which achieve an accident, an open or a suicide verdict. This suggests that in England and Wales coroners may not be consistent in their suicide ascertainment criteria.Hypotheses attempting to account for differences in suicide rate based on such epidemiological surveys should be viewed with great caution.

Publisher

Royal College of Psychiatrists

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference17 articles.

1. Suicide in Dublin: I. The Under-reporting of Suicide and the Consequences for National Statistics

2. Differences between Suicide Rates

3. Can we rely on suicide statistics?;Ettlinger;Sartryck ur. Statistik Tidshrift,1964

4. Coroners Society of England and Wales (1966–67) Annual Report. Published privately for members.

Cited by 58 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3