Abstract
SummaryThe implementation of a policy of ‘community care’ is seen to involve a number of assumptions, some of which are rarely examined. These can be roughly categorized as involving the nature of mental illness, the nature of community, the course and treatment of mental illness, the proper scope of psychiatry, the burden on the community and the efficacy of social work. Data bearing on these assumptions are reviewed, and the conclusion is offered that they are far from being uncontentious.It is suggested that the movement toward community care has many of the attributes of a moral enterprise which, unless substantiated by benefits to the patient or his family, may be the latest diversion of the psychiatric conscience from the care and treatment of the chronic mentally ill.
Publisher
Royal College of Psychiatrists
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Cited by
43 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Does the community care?;Journal of the British Institute of Mental Handicap (APEX);2009-08-26
2. The impact of hostel care on mentally handicapped adults;Journal of the British Institute of Mental Handicap (APEX);2009-08-26
3. EVALUATING COMMUNITY CARE FOR THE MENTALLY HANDICAPPED ADULT: A COMPARISON OF HOSTEL, HOME AND HOSPITAL CARE;Journal of Intellectual Disability Research;2008-06-28
4. Some Quandaries Facing the Health Visitor in These Times of Change;Ciba Foundation Symposium 43 - Health Care in a Changing Setting: The UK Experience;2008-05-30
5. The community psychiatrist in 2008: anachronism, Cinderella or pioneer?;Psychiatric Bulletin;2008-05