Abstract
SUMMARYMeasuring outcomes is becoming an increasingly standard (and highly complex) part of what mental health services are expected to do. Practising psychiatrists will need to have a good understanding of approaches to outcome measurement: used well, they have the potential to amplify the patient voice, promote good-quality services and facilitate research. We discuss what constitutes an outcome measure, the different ways that such measures can be obtained and the mechanisms for assessing the quality and appropriateness of an outcome measure. We outline the rapidly evolving research and policy context regarding outcome measurement, with particular reference to the UK's National Health Service. We also consider the potential pitfalls to outcome measurement, such as added clinical burden, inappropriate incentivisation of behaviour and incorrect interpretation of results. We discuss ways that such difficulties can be avoided or their effects mitigated.
Publisher
Royal College of Psychiatrists
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference40 articles.
1. NHS England, NHS Improvement (2016a) Delivering the Five Year Forward View for Mental Health: Developing Quality and Outcomes Measures. NHS England, NHS Improvement.
2. COMET Initiative (2020) Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials. COMET Initiative (http://www.comet-initiative.org/). Accessed 17 Apr 2020.
3. Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献