Author:
Berney T.,Kolvin I.,Bhate S. R.,Garside R. F.,Jeans J.,Kay B.,Scarth L.
Abstract
SummaryA double-blind trial failed to demonstrate any significant short-term effects of clomipramine in doses recommended for use in general practice (in addition to the usual range of psychotherapeutic help) in the treatment of children with school refusal and neurotic disorder. Patterns of improvement were also studied for the sample as a whole irrespective of treatment. Neither age nor sex were significantly related to improvement, except on one behavioural measure where girls initially did better than boys. In addition, it was found that there was a rapid relief of depression but neurotic symptomatology tended to persist.
Publisher
Royal College of Psychiatrists
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Cited by
174 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. School Refusal: Conceptualization, Leading Factors, and Intervention;Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences;2023-02-07
2. Psychopharmacology in adolescents;Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology;2023
3. Anxiolytika und Sedativa/Hypnotika;Neuro-/Psychopharmaka im Kindes- und Jugendalter;2023
4. A Systematic Review of Somatic Symptoms in School Refusal;Psychosomatic Medicine;2021-06-12
5. Anxiety Disorders;Transition-Age Youth Mental Health Care;2021