A Simple and Reliable Subclassification of Chronic Schizophrenia

Author:

Wing J. K.

Abstract

No detailed and comprehensive system of subclassification of chronic schizophrenia has been generally adopted in this country. Most psychiatrists are content to use the broad categories of simple, hebephrenic, catatonic, paranoid and undifferentiated schizophrenia. Placing a patient into one of these subgroups entails a judgment which is based upon all the information at the clinician's disposal. Such data are necessarily unstandardized; the method of collection varies from doctor to doctor and from patient to patient, and the criteria of classification are not uniformly agreed upon. No objective tests are available which would serve to check the accuracy of the decisions taken. It is inevitable, in these circumstances, that clinical systems of subclassification should not be much used for scientific purposes. The basic essential of a classifying instrument is that it should produce the same results in the hands of different investigators, and that its standards of measurement should not vary from one occasion to another. No study so far published has attempted to deal with this problem, which becomes more serious as the elaboration (and possibly the clinical usefulness) of the classification increases. Leonhard's system (1, 4, 5) for example, would gain enormously if its reliability could be demonstrated.

Publisher

Royal College of Psychiatrists

Subject

General Medicine

Reference9 articles.

1. A short scale for rating ‘activity-withdrawal’ in schizophrenics;Venables;J. Ment. Sci.,1957

2. Leonhard K. , Die defektschizophrenen Krankheitsbilder, 1936. Leipzig.

3. Hempel C. G. , Some Problems of Taxonomy. Proceedings of American Psychopathological Association Work Conference, 1959. (In press.)

4. Leonhard's classification of schizophrenia;Fish;J. Ment. Sci.,1958

5. Idem , Die Aufteilung der endogenen Psychosen, 1957. Berlin.

Cited by 238 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3