Community treatment orders: Are they useful?

Abstract

SummaryIn the wake of the deinstitutionalisation of mental health services, community treatment orders (CTOs) have been introduced in around 75 jurisdictions worldwide. They make it a legal requirement for patients to adhere to treatment plans outside of hospital. To date, about 60 CTO outcome studies have been conducted. All studies with a methodology strong enough to infer causality conclude that CTOs do not have the intended effect of preventing relapse and reducing hospital admissions. Despite this, CTOs are still debated, possibly reflecting different attitudes to the role of evidence-based practice in community psychiatry. There are clinical, ethical, legal, economic and professional reasons why the current use of CTOs should be reconsidered.Learning Objectives• Gain an overview of the development and use of CTOs in the UK and internationally• Get up-to-date information about the evidence base for CTO effectiveness and the relative contributions of different levels of evidence• Appreciate the nature of the current controversy around the use of CTOs and become familiar with the factors in the ongoing debate about their future