Abstract
SummaryThe Human Rights Act was introduced into UK law in 2000 and must be considered in all cases, including mental health review tribunals. Article 8 (the right to respect for private and family life) comprises two parts and has embedded in it ‘tests’ that must be applied when assessing any interference with this protected right. A review of Article 8 case law reveals how it is used and how it can be applied in a myriad of clinical situations. Because it involves the right to respect for private life, and is in a sense individualised, it will potentially affect people (both patients and staff) in the mental health services in a variety of ways. Article 8 has implications not only for patients but also for clinicians and healthcare organisations.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference40 articles.
1. Dudgeon v. UK (1981) 4 EHRR 149.
2. Article 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998: implications for clinical practice
3. Botta v. Italy (1998) ECHR (Merits) Application no. 21439/93 24th February.
4. Valentina Pentiacova and others v. Moldova (2005) ECHR (Admissibility Decision) 04/01/2005 Application no. 14462/03.
5. Kroon v. Netherlands (1994) 19 EHRR 263.
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献