Field Dependence and the Factor Structure of the General Health Questionnaire in Normal Subjects

Author:

Parkes Katharine R.

Abstract

SummaryThe factor structure of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) was investigated in a non-clinical sample in relation to the role of field dependence (assessed by the Hidden Figures Test) in influencing the extent to which different aspects of psychoneurotic disturbance are differentiated. Greater differentiation was achieved by the field independent (FI) group than by the field dependent (FD) group, as shown by: (i) the proportion of variance accounted for by the general factor in the principal components analysis of the 60-item GHQ data was lower (17 per cent) in the FI group than in the FD group (33 per cent); (ii) the factor loadings in the FI group, but not the FD group, corresponded closely with the four subscales of the 28-item scaled GHQ; (iii) the interscale correlations were significantly lower in the FI group than in the FD group. The implications of these findings are discussed, particularly their relevance to ‘unitary’ and ‘distinct-syndrome’ models of minor anxiety and depressive disorders, and the greater probability of occurrence of mixed states in field dependent subjects.

Publisher

Royal College of Psychiatrists

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Meta-Analysis of Factor Analyses of the General Health Questionnaire – Short Forms GHQ-28 and GHQ-30;European Journal of Psychological Assessment;2022-09-13

2. Performance on Embedded Figures Tests;Journal of Individual Differences;2009-01

3. A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the GHQ12 Using a Large Australian Sample;European Journal of Psychological Assessment;2007-01

4. Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the GHQ-12: Can I See that Again?;Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry;2003-08

5. The impact of cancer on key relatives: A comparison of relative and patient concerns;European Journal of Cancer;1995-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3