Abstract
Since the Woolf reforms were incorporated into legal practice in civil cases in England and Scotland, there has been a distinction between expert and professional witnesses. A common feature is the appointment of an agreed expert to give evidence on aspects of a case that require expert testimony. These changes do not apply in criminal cases nor in other jurisdictions such as the Republic of Ireland. However, all witnesses, whether professional or expert, must be objective, since their role is to assist the court. There is little or no training of clinicians in how to become an expert and suggestions for improving this are discussed. Practical aspects of accepting a brief from a solicitor are considered.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference10 articles.
1. National Justice Compania Naviera S.A. v. Prudential Assurance Co. Ltd. (Ikarian Reefer Case) [1993] 37 EG 158.
2. Davie v. Edinburgh Magistrates [1953] SC 34.
3. R v. Turner [1975] QB 834; 60 Cr App R 80.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献