Abstract
Aims and method
NHS England recommends the commissioning of intensive support teams (ISTs) to provide effective support to people with intellectual disability (ID) when in crisis. However, there is a paucity of evidence regarding how these services should be organised. This exploratory secondary analysis of data from the IST-ID study aimed to investigate IST characteristics that relate to clinical outcomes. The primary outcome was mean change in the total score on the Aberrant Behavior Checklist and its subscales.
Results
A measure of mental illness severity was the only variable associated with our primary outcome of reduction in challenging behaviour. Accommodation type, affective status and gender were associated with the subdomains of irritability, hyperactivity and lethargy in unadjusted and adjusted analyses.
Clinical implications
Our findings indicate that variation in clinical outcomes is influenced by individual rather than organisational factors. Further research on the theoretical fidelity of the IST-ID model is needed.
Publisher
Royal College of Psychiatrists
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference32 articles.
1. Assessment of challenging behavior exhibited by people with intellectual and developmental disabilities: a systematic review;Reyes-Martín;Int J Environ Res Public Health,2022
2. Recognition and treatment of mood dysregulation in adults with intellectual disability;Noel;Ment Health Clin,2018
3. 11 Lloyd-Evans, B , Johnson, J , the CORE Research Group. Core Crisis Resolution Team Fidelity Scale: Version 2. University College London, no date (https://www.ucl.ac.uk/core-study/sites/core-study/files/fidelity-scale-final-pdf_0.pdf).
4. Randomized, single-blind, controlled trial of a specialist behavior therapy team for challenging behavior in adults with intellectual disabilities;Hassiotis;Am J Psychiatry,2009
5. The role of behaviour problems in screening for mental ill-health in adults with intellectual disability;Westlake;Eur J Psychiatry,2021