Abstract
Summary
Social prescribing is poorly defined and there is little evidence for its effectiveness. It cannot address the social determinants of mental health and it is unlikely to produce enduring change for that part of the population that suffers the worst physical and mental health, namely the most deprived and marginalised. It has emerged at a time of growing health inequity. This has occurred alongside the neglect of social care and of the social aspects of mental health intervention. Social prescribing gives a false impression of addressing social factors, and as such is counterproductive. We can do better than this.
Publisher
Royal College of Psychiatrists
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference12 articles.
1. THE INVERSE CARE LAW
2. Schizophrenia outcomes in the 21st century: A systematic review
3. Non-clinical community interventions: a systematised review of social prescribing schemes
4. Forecast and follow-up an investigation into the clinical, social, and mental factors determining the results of hospital treatment;Querido;Br J Prev Soc Med,1959
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献