Accuracy of general practitioner's prognosis of the 1-year course of depression and generalised anxiety

Abstract

BackgroundA prognosis serves important functions for the management of common mental disorders in primary care.AimsTo establish the accuracy of the general practitioner's (GP) prognosis.MethodThe agreement between GP prognosis and observed course was determined for 138 cases of ICD–10 depression and 65 of generalised anxiety disorder, identified among consecutive attenders of 18 GPs.ResultsModest agreement between GP prognosis and course was found, both for depression (κ=0.21) and generalised anxiety (κ=0.111). Better agreement (κ=0.45 for depression, and κ=0.33 for generalised anxiety) was observed between the course and predictions from a statistical model based on information potentially available to the GP at the time the prognosis was made. This model assesses attainable performance for GPs.ConclusionsGeneral practitioners do a fair job in predicting the 1-year course of depression and generalised anxiety. Even so, their performance falls significantly short of attainable performance.