Investigating the association between characteristics of local crisis care systems and service use in an English national survey

Author:

Rojas-García AntonioORCID,Dalton-Locke ChristianORCID,Sheridan Rains Luke,Dare Ceri,Ginestet Cedric,Foye Una,Kelly Kathleen,Landau Sabine,Lynch Chris,McCrone PaulORCID,Nairi Shilpa,Newbigging Karen,Nyikavaranda Patrick,Osborn DavidORCID,Persaud Karen,Sevdalis Nick,Stefan Martin,Stuart RuthORCID,Simpson Alan,Johnson Sonia,Lloyd-Evans BrynmorORCID

Abstract

Background In England, a range of mental health crisis care models and approaches to organising crisis care systems have been implemented, but characteristics associated with their effectiveness are poorly understood. Aims To (a) develop a typology of catchment area mental health crisis care systems and (b) investigate how crisis care service models and system characteristics relate to psychiatric hospital admissions and detentions. Method Crisis systems data were obtained from a 2019 English national survey. Latent class analyses were conducted to identify discernible typologies, and mixed-effects negative binomial regression models were fitted to explore associations between crisis care models and admissions and detention rates, obtained from nationally reported data. Results No clear typology of catchment area crisis care systems emerged. Regression models suggested that provision of a crisis telephone service within the local crisis system was associated with a 11.6% lower admissions rate and 15.3% lower detention rate. Provision of a crisis cafe was associated with a 7.8% lower admission rates. The provision of a crisis assessment team separate from the crisis resolution and home treatment service was associated with a 12.8% higher admission rate. Conclusions The configuration of crisis care systems varies considerably in England, but we could not derive a typology that convincingly categorised crisis care systems. Our results suggest that a crisis phone line and a crisis cafe may be associated with lower admission rates. However, our findings suggest crisis assessment teams, separate from home treatment teams, may not be associated with reductions in admission and detentions.

Publisher

Royal College of Psychiatrists

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference28 articles.

1. 22 Medical Research Council (MRC). Is My Study Research? MRC, 2017 (https://www.hra-decisiontools.org.uk/research/).

2. Investigating geographical variation in the use of mental health services by area of England: a cross-sectional ecological study;Maconick;BMC Health Serv Res,2021

3. What service users with psychotic disorders want in a mental health crisis or relapse: thematic analysis of joint crisis plans;Farrelly;Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol,2014

4. A scoping review of studies into crisis resolution teams in community mental health services;Holgersen;Nord J Psychiatry,2022

5. Crisis intervention for people with severe mental illnesses;Murphy;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2015

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3