Abstract
English law on young people's consent to treatment and competence is complex and can even appear contradictory. For example, competent minors can consent, but their refusal can be overruled by the consent of a person with parental authority or by the court. This paper is an attempt to make sense of the topic for clinicians. It includes a discussion of the law and the small body of relevant research evidence. There are clinical case examples, checklists and guidelines for good practice. However, it is not a substitute for legal advice, which should be sought wherever doubt remains.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference27 articles.
1. Re MB (Caesarean Section) [1997] 8 Med LR 217, (1997) 38 BMLR 175, CA.
2. Re C (Detention: Medical Treatment) [1997] 2 FLR 180
3. Gillick v. West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority [1986] AC 112.
4. Tests of competence to consent to treatment;Roth;American Journal of Psychiatry,1977
Cited by
42 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献