Author:
Salize Hans Joachim,Dressing Harald
Abstract
BackgroundDespite the tendency for harmonisation of strategies for mental health care delivery, rules and regulations for involuntary placement or treatment of mentally ill persons still differ remarkably internationally. Rapid European integration and other political developments require valid and reliable international overviews, sound studies and profound analyses of this controversial issue.AimsTo give an overview of compulsory admission data from official sources across the European Union (EU).MethodData on the legal frameworks for involuntary placement or treatment of people with mental illness and their outcomes were provided and assessed by experts from all EU member states.ResultsTotal frequencies of admission and compulsory admission rates vary remarkably across the EU. Variation hints at the influence of differences in legal frameworks or procedures. Time series suggest an overall tendency towards more or less stable quotas in most member states.ConclusionsFurther research is greatly needed in this field. Common international health reporting standards are essential to the compilation of basic data.
Publisher
Royal College of Psychiatrists
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference21 articles.
1. Gender differences among civilly committed schizophrenia subjects;Sanguineti;Schizophrenia Bulletin,1996
2. Characteristics associated with change in the legal status of involuntary psychiatric patients;Nicholson;Hospital and Community Psychiatry,1988
3. Police Admissions to a Psychiatric Hospital
4. The paradoxical increase in involuntary admissions after the revision of the Civil Commitment Law in Belgium;Lecompte;Medicine and Law,1995
5. Perceived ethnicity and the risk of compulsory admission
Cited by
298 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献